Calculate calories burned climbing stairs by weight and time. Free MET-based stair-climbing calorie calculator with flights-to-calories tables.
Quick answer
Climbing stairs burns about 325–512 calories per hour, or 54–85 calories in 10 minutes, for adults weighing 130–205 lb (59–93 kg). That estimate uses a MET value of 5.5 (moderate ascent); see the table below for other intensities. These figures are estimates from population-average MET values, not measurements of your own energy expenditure — actual burn varies with intensity, fitness, body composition and technique.
Example calculation
A 155 lb (70 kg) adult — moderate ascent — for 10 minutes:
5.5 MET × 70 kg × 0.17 h = 64 calories
That is 385 calories per hour, or about 6.4 calories per minute.
Calories burned climbing stairs per hour, by body weight
Calories burned per hour by stair pace and body weight (MET method).
Stair pace
MET
130 lb (59 kg)
155 lb (70 kg)
180 lb (82 kg)
205 lb (93 kg)
Descending stairs
3.5
207 cal
245 cal
287 cal
326 cal
Slow ascent
4
236 cal
280 cal
328 cal
372 cal
Moderate ascent
5.5
325 cal
385 cal
451 cal
512 cal
Fast ascent / running up
8.8
519 cal
616 cal
722 cal
818 cal
Calories burned in 10 minutes
Calories burned in 10 minutes of climbing stairs, by body weight.
Stair pace
130 lb (59 kg)
155 lb (70 kg)
180 lb (82 kg)
205 lb (93 kg)
Descending stairs
34 cal
41 cal
48 cal
54 cal
Slow ascent
39 cal
47 cal
55 cal
62 cal
Moderate ascent
54 cal
64 cal
75 cal
85 cal
Fast ascent / running up
87 cal
103 cal
120 cal
136 cal
Method and formula
Calories = MET × body weight in kilograms × duration in hours. MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) expresses the energy cost of an activity as a multiple of resting metabolism, where 1 MET ≈ 1 kcal per kilogram of body weight per hour. Pounds are converted with lb ÷ 2.20462 = kg. Totals are rounded to the nearest whole calorie and per-minute figures to one decimal; no rounding is applied before the final step.
MET values for climbing stairs are taken from the 2011/2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities.
What changes the result
Body weight: Directly proportional — doubling body weight doubles the estimate at the same MET and duration.
Duration: Directly proportional — calories scale linearly with time at a constant intensity.
Intensity: Sets the MET value. Moving one intensity step up typically raises burn 20–40%.
Terrain and incline: Not in the base MET value; uphill or resistance work increases the true cost.
Fitness and efficiency: Trained people use less energy for the same output, so estimates skew high for them.
Age, sex and body composition: Change resting metabolism and therefore the baseline the MET multiplies.
Limitations
Step height and stride pattern (single vs double steps) change the cost per flight.
Few people climb continuously for an hour, so hourly figures are extrapolations.
Every figure here is an estimate, not a measurement — treat it as a planning number rather than a result.
MET values are population averages from the Compendium of Physical Activities; individual results commonly differ by 10–20%.
Actual intensity and pace matter more than the label: two people at the same nominal intensity can differ substantially in real effort.
Body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness change the result — more lean mass raises the baseline, while trained people move more efficiently and often burn less than the table shows.
Terrain, incline, surface and movement technique are not captured by a flat-ground MET value.
These are gross calories — they include the resting energy you would have burned anyway during that time.
MET tables are standardised on a 70 kg adult, so estimates are least accurate at very low or very high body weights.
Heart-rate monitors, wearables and laboratory indirect calorimetry can all give different numbers; measured testing is more accurate for an individual than any MET-based estimate.