How Many Calories Do You Burn at Work? (Job Calculator)
Calculate calories burned at work by job type and hours. Free calculator covering office, nursing, construction, retail, and 20+ other occupations.
Quick answer
Working burns about 236–372 calories per hour, or 1888–2976 calories in 8 hours, for adults weighing 130–205 lb (59–93 kg). That estimate uses a MET value of 4 (moderate (teaching, walking job)); see the table below for other intensities. These figures are estimates from population-average MET values, not measurements of your own energy expenditure — actual burn varies with intensity, fitness, body composition and technique.
Example calculation
A 155 lb (70 kg) adult — moderate (teaching, walking job) — for 8 hours (480 minutes):
4 MET × 70 kg × 8 h = 2240 calories
That is 280 calories per hour, or about 4.7 calories per minute.
Calories burned working per hour, by body weight
Calories burned per hour by job type and body weight (MET method).
Job type
MET
130 lb (59 kg)
155 lb (70 kg)
180 lb (82 kg)
205 lb (93 kg)
Sedentary (office/desk)
1.5
89 cal
105 cal
123 cal
140 cal
Light (retail, standing desk)
2.5
148 cal
175 cal
205 cal
233 cal
Moderate (teaching, walking job)
4
236 cal
280 cal
328 cal
372 cal
Active (warehouse, delivery)
5.5
325 cal
385 cal
451 cal
512 cal
Very active (construction, farming)
7
413 cal
490 cal
574 cal
651 cal
Calories burned in 8 hours
Calories burned in 8 hours of working, by body weight.
Job type
130 lb (59 kg)
155 lb (70 kg)
180 lb (82 kg)
205 lb (93 kg)
Sedentary (office/desk)
708 cal
840 cal
984 cal
1116 cal
Light (retail, standing desk)
1180 cal
1400 cal
1640 cal
1860 cal
Moderate (teaching, walking job)
1888 cal
2240 cal
2624 cal
2976 cal
Active (warehouse, delivery)
2596 cal
3080 cal
3608 cal
4092 cal
Very active (construction, farming)
3304 cal
3920 cal
4592 cal
5208 cal
Method and formula
Calories = MET × body weight in kilograms × duration in hours. MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) expresses the energy cost of an activity as a multiple of resting metabolism, where 1 MET ≈ 1 kcal per kilogram of body weight per hour. Pounds are converted with lb ÷ 2.20462 = kg. Totals are rounded to the nearest whole calorie and per-minute figures to one decimal; no rounding is applied before the final step.
MET values for working are taken from the 2011/2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities.
What changes the result
Body weight: Directly proportional — doubling body weight doubles the estimate at the same MET and duration.
Duration: Directly proportional — calories scale linearly with time at a constant intensity.
Intensity: Sets the MET value. Moving one intensity step up typically raises burn 20–40%.
Terrain and incline: Not in the base MET value; uphill or resistance work increases the true cost.
Fitness and efficiency: Trained people use less energy for the same output, so estimates skew high for them.
Age, sex and body composition: Change resting metabolism and therefore the baseline the MET multiplies.
Limitations
A workday mixes tasks; a single MET value is a shift-average, not a minute-by-minute rate.
Breaks, commuting and desk time inside "active" jobs lower the true average.
Every figure here is an estimate, not a measurement — treat it as a planning number rather than a result.
MET values are population averages from the Compendium of Physical Activities; individual results commonly differ by 10–20%.
Actual intensity and pace matter more than the label: two people at the same nominal intensity can differ substantially in real effort.
Body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness change the result — more lean mass raises the baseline, while trained people move more efficiently and often burn less than the table shows.
Terrain, incline, surface and movement technique are not captured by a flat-ground MET value.
These are gross calories — they include the resting energy you would have burned anyway during that time.
MET tables are standardised on a 70 kg adult, so estimates are least accurate at very low or very high body weights.
Heart-rate monitors, wearables and laboratory indirect calorimetry can all give different numbers; measured testing is more accurate for an individual than any MET-based estimate.