How Many Calories Do You Burn at Work? (Job Calculator)

Calculate calories burned at work by job type and hours. Free calculator covering office, nursing, construction, retail, and 20+ other occupations.

Quick answer

Working burns about 236–372 calories per hour, or 1888–2976 calories in 8 hours, for adults weighing 130–205 lb (59–93 kg). That estimate uses a MET value of 4 (moderate (teaching, walking job)); see the table below for other intensities. These figures are estimates from population-average MET values, not measurements of your own energy expenditure — actual burn varies with intensity, fitness, body composition and technique.

Example calculation

A 155 lb (70 kg) adult — moderate (teaching, walking job) — for 8 hours (480 minutes):

4 MET × 70 kg × 8 h = 2240 calories

That is 280 calories per hour, or about 4.7 calories per minute.

Calories burned working per hour, by body weight

Calories burned per hour by job type and body weight (MET method).
Job typeMET130 lb (59 kg)155 lb (70 kg)180 lb (82 kg)205 lb (93 kg)
Sedentary (office/desk)1.589 cal105 cal123 cal140 cal
Light (retail, standing desk)2.5148 cal175 cal205 cal233 cal
Moderate (teaching, walking job)4236 cal280 cal328 cal372 cal
Active (warehouse, delivery)5.5325 cal385 cal451 cal512 cal
Very active (construction, farming)7413 cal490 cal574 cal651 cal

Calories burned in 8 hours

Calories burned in 8 hours of working, by body weight.
Job type130 lb (59 kg)155 lb (70 kg)180 lb (82 kg)205 lb (93 kg)
Sedentary (office/desk)708 cal840 cal984 cal1116 cal
Light (retail, standing desk)1180 cal1400 cal1640 cal1860 cal
Moderate (teaching, walking job)1888 cal2240 cal2624 cal2976 cal
Active (warehouse, delivery)2596 cal3080 cal3608 cal4092 cal
Very active (construction, farming)3304 cal3920 cal4592 cal5208 cal

Method and formula

Calories = MET × body weight in kilograms × duration in hours. MET (Metabolic Equivalent of Task) expresses the energy cost of an activity as a multiple of resting metabolism, where 1 MET ≈ 1 kcal per kilogram of body weight per hour. Pounds are converted with lb ÷ 2.20462 = kg. Totals are rounded to the nearest whole calorie and per-minute figures to one decimal; no rounding is applied before the final step.

MET values for working are taken from the 2011/2024 Adult Compendium of Physical Activities.

What changes the result

  • Body weight: Directly proportional — doubling body weight doubles the estimate at the same MET and duration.
  • Duration: Directly proportional — calories scale linearly with time at a constant intensity.
  • Intensity: Sets the MET value. Moving one intensity step up typically raises burn 20–40%.
  • Terrain and incline: Not in the base MET value; uphill or resistance work increases the true cost.
  • Fitness and efficiency: Trained people use less energy for the same output, so estimates skew high for them.
  • Age, sex and body composition: Change resting metabolism and therefore the baseline the MET multiplies.

Limitations

  • A workday mixes tasks; a single MET value is a shift-average, not a minute-by-minute rate.
  • Breaks, commuting and desk time inside "active" jobs lower the true average.
  • Every figure here is an estimate, not a measurement — treat it as a planning number rather than a result.
  • MET values are population averages from the Compendium of Physical Activities; individual results commonly differ by 10–20%.
  • Actual intensity and pace matter more than the label: two people at the same nominal intensity can differ substantially in real effort.
  • Body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness change the result — more lean mass raises the baseline, while trained people move more efficiently and often burn less than the table shows.
  • Terrain, incline, surface and movement technique are not captured by a flat-ground MET value.
  • These are gross calories — they include the resting energy you would have burned anyway during that time.
  • MET tables are standardised on a 70 kg adult, so estimates are least accurate at very low or very high body weights.
  • Heart-rate monitors, wearables and laboratory indirect calorimetry can all give different numbers; measured testing is more accurate for an individual than any MET-based estimate.

Last updated: